Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Ann. hepatol ; 16(2): 188-197, Mar.-Apr. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-887222

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background and aim. The combination of Sofosbuvir (SOF) and Ledipasvir (LDV) has been lead to considerable enhancement of treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. A meta-analysis of the currently available studies was undertaken with the aim to evaluate the antiviral efficacy of SOF/LDV therapy for 12 or 24 weeks with or without Ribavirin (RBV) in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. Material and methods. In this meta-analysis, we searched databases including PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct and Web of Science using appropriate keywords. All papers which evaluated the efficacy of combination therapy of SOF/LDV with or without RBV for 12 or 24 weeks among patients with HCV genotype 1 infection were included. Results. The 20 published articles were assessed for eligibility and finally 10 articles pooling 2248 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled SVR12 for four SOF/LDV regimens were 95% (95%CI = 93%-97%) for 12 weeks of treatment with SOF/LDV, 97% (95%CI = 95%-98%) for 24 weeks of treatment with SOF/LDV, 96% (95%CI = 94%-97%) for 12 weeks of treatment with SOF/ LDV/RBV and 98% (95%CI = 97%-99%) for 24 weeks of treatment with SOF/LDV/RBV. Only in treatment regimen of SOF/LDV for 12 weeks, cirrhosis had a significant effect on the SVR12 (OR = 0.21, 95%CI = 0.07-0.66). Furthermore, NS5A resistance-associated substitutions at baseline were associated with decrease in the rate of SVR (OR = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.2-0.5). Conclusions. The Interferon-free regimen of SOF/LDV for 12 or 24 weeks with or without RBV is highly effective for treatment of patients with HCV genotype 1 infection.


Subject(s)
Humans , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Fluorenes/therapeutic use , Sofosbuvir/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Chi-Square Distribution , Odds Ratio , Treatment Outcome , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/virology , Hepacivirus/genetics , Drug Therapy, Combination , Fluorenes/adverse effects , Sofosbuvir/adverse effects , Sustained Virologic Response , Genotype
2.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 2015 Jan-Mar ; 18(1): 34-38
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-156499

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a proven therapeutic method in selected patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction which increases left ventricular function and patient survival. We designed a study that included patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), with and without CRT‑defibrillator (CRT‑D) inserting and then measured its effects on these two groups. Patients and Methods: Between 2010 and 2013, we conducted a prospective cohort study on 100 coronary artery disease patients where candidate for CABG. Then based on the receiving CRT‑D, the patients were categorized in two groups; Group 1 (n = 48, with CRT‑D insertion before CABG) and Group 2 (n = 52 without receiving CRT‑D). Thereafter both of these groups were followed‑up at 1–3 months after CABG for mortality, hospitalization, atrial fibrillation (AF), echocardiographic assessment, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class level. Results: The mean age of participants in Group 1 (48 male) and in Group 2 (52 male) was 58 ± 13 and 57 ± 12 respectively. Difference between Groups 1 and 2 in cases of mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) changes and NYHA class level was significant (P > 0.05). Hospitalization (P = 0.008), mortality rate (P = 0.007), and AF were significantly different between these two groups. Conclusions: The results showed that the increase in LVEF and patient’s improvement according to NYHA‑class was significant in the first group, and readmission, mortality rate and AF was increased significantly in the second group.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Coronary Artery Bypass , Defibrillators, Implantable/therapeutic use , Heart Function Tests/analysis , Heart Function Tests/methods , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL